Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14196 Record ID: 132154b8-2edf-457f-b6c3-480eea3865c0
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wangmann, Jane | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:11:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:11:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | No. 22, October 2011 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14438496 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14196 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, UNSW | en |
| dc.subject | Theories of violence | en |
| dc.subject | Men as victims | en |
| dc.subject | Perpetrators | en |
| dc.subject | Measurement | en |
| dc.title | Different types of intimate partner violence: an exploration of the literature | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse issues paper | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 6131 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/PDF%20files/IssuesPaper_22.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Serial | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | National | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Duplicate | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.adfvc.unsw.edu.au/RTF%20Files/Issues_Paper_22.rtf | en |
| dc.description.notes | Key Points:<br/ >* The last 15 years has seen a growing body of research emphasising that not all intimate partner violence (IPV) is the same. There are key differences in terms of the presence of control, gender perpetration, severity and impact.<br/ ><br/ >* Work on differentiation is diverse. It includes research exploring different types of IPV, as well as different types of male and female perpetrators of IPV.<br/ ><br/ >* There is great interest in the potential of differentiation to assist in more appropriately targeted interventions for victims, perpetrators and any children of the relationship. In particular, in the area of family law in Australia, along with Canada and the United States, there has been some interest expressed in the potential for differentiation to provide for more nuanced responses that take account of the type of violence or perpetrator when making determinations about ongoing parenting arrangements.<br/ ><br/ >* A range of important concerns and criticisms have been raised about the methodology of various typologies, as well as concerns about their translation into practice. They suggest that there is still much more work to be done on the articulation of typologies before a useful tool can be developed to assist delineation in practice. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse issues paper | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2011-11-25 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Sydney, NSW | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.