Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14200
Record ID: 6d2b58e3-c2da-4115-927d-c948301c622b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKramer, Ronalden
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:11:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:11:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citation[ahead-of-print], June 23, 2015en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14200-
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectAbuseen
dc.subjectLawen
dc.subjectSentencingen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.titleDifferential punishment of similar behaviour: Sentencing assault cases in a specialized family violence court and 'regular sentencing' courtsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid13234en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/56/4/689/2747207en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notes"This article explores legal responses to domestic and non-domestic assaults. It finds that men who assault intimate partners receive sentences that emphasize their rehabilitative needs and often result in discharges without conviction. Conversely, non-domestic assaults are met with relative severity."en
dc.identifier.sourceBritish journal of criminologyen
dc.date.entered2016-05-04en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing