Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14239
Record ID: 319ee8f3-2f26-4f84-82ef-834f950a5b04
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Desmonden
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:11:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:11:52Z-
dc.date.issued2008en
dc.identifier.citation46 (3), July 2008en
dc.identifier.issn1531-2445en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14239-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAssociation of Family and Conciliation Courtsen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten
dc.subjectTrainingen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectPost-separation violenceen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.titleDivorce and the family court: what can be done about domestic violence?en
dc.title.alternativeFamily court reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid628en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview:This North American article explores the role of family courts in preventing and reducing the incidence of domestic violence during and after separation or divorce proceedings. The author posits three ways in which family courts can achieve this: first, by reducing the adversarial nature of proceedings (for example, through the use of divorce mediation); second, through the implementation of a mandatory risk assessment and risk management process; and third, through mandatory education and training for court personnel in the dynamics of domestic violence.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion:The article begins with a discussion of the links between adversarial proceedings and the incidence of domestic violence. The author cites a range of empirical studies which suggest that adversarial court processes heighten the level of conflict between partners and argues that, in comparison, domestic violence rarely occurs during and after collaborative proceedings.<br/ ><br/ >The middle section discusses the value of triage systems and describes the development of the Domestic Violence Evaluation (DOVE) screening instrument. DOVE assigns the divorcing parties to three different risk categories, which are in turn used to determine what form of proceedings is most appropriate (for example, mediation, collaborative lawyer negotiations, trials) and what other community-based interventions may be required.<br/ ><br/ >The final section, on mandatory education and training, outlines the content of the DOVE education program. The program consists of 21-hours of workshops, covering three broad topics: definitions of domestic violence; the dynamics of domestic violence; and post-separation violence. The author notes that education on domestic violence is mandatory for court personnel in Ontario, Canada.en
dc.identifier.sourceFamily court reviewen
dc.date.entered2010-02-26en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing