Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14260
Record ID: 3cccac2a-3b26-4e58-a229-10fdb4afa381
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBader, Danielleen
dc.contributor.authorWalters, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Myrnaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:12:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:12:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 59, Issue 6en
dc.identifier.issn1464-3529en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14260-
dc.description.abstractPro-charging policies were implemented in Canada in the 1980s to denounce intimate partner violence (IPV). Since pro-charging policies were implemented, the proportion of men charged remains higher than women charged; however, the proportion of women charged increased dramatically. Little is known about the gendered differences in charging decisions in IPV cases. Utilizing a sample of 1,708 accused charged in IPV cases, logistic regression was employed to examine the influence of accused gender on the number of charges laid and the type of primary offence accused were charged with. The findings reveal there are differences between male- and female-perpetrated violence or responses to their violence, requiring more investigation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofThe British Journal of Criminologyen
dc.titleDoes Gender Affect the Number and Type of Charges Laid in Intimate Partner Violence Cases?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid15622en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.date.entered2019-10-08en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing