Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14269
Record ID: 10ea3b84-7f5b-4133-bb14-5fcff73b389a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Carolynen
dc.contributor.authorBugeja, Lyndalen
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Myrnaen
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, Sara-Janeen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:12:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:12:04Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16, no. 2en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14269-
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.subjectDeath reviewsen
dc.subjectFamily violenceen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.titleDomestic / family violence death reviews : An international comparisonen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid12997en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesDomestic/Family Violence Death Reviews (D/FVDRs) have been established in a number of high-income countries since 1990 as a mechanism to inform prevention-focused interventions to reduce domestic/family violence. D/FVDRs differ in their structure, governance, case identification processes and inclusion criteria, review measures, and outputs.This study examines the extent of heterogeneity of the core elements of D/FVDRs across and within countries to inform the establishment of D/FVDRs elsewhere.en
dc.identifier.sourceTrauma, violence & abuseen
dc.date.entered2015-08-26en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing