Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14274
Record ID: 57e75e31-6f19-4ddd-aa73-589d87831dcf
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSloan-Lynch, Jayen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citation27 (4), November 2012en
dc.identifier.issn1527-2001en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14274-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley Online Libraryen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.subjectRepresentations of womenen
dc.subjectSexual assaulten
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleDomestic abuse as terrorismen
dc.title.alternativeHypatiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2594en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis US article challenges various philosophers’ and feminist authors’ conceptions of domestic violence as a form of terrorism. Sloan-Lynch identifies three considerable problems with this claim; terrorism is seen as politically driven; terrorism requires that intent to terrorise be demonstrated; equating terrorism with domestic abuse may be unhelpful or inappropriate. Sloan-Lynch then deconstructs her own critiques, finding responses to her challenges, and concludes that domestic violence does indeed fit with the tenets of terrorism.en
dc.identifier.sourceHypatiaen
dc.date.entered2013-10-18en
dc.subject.anratopicSexual violenceen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing