Domestic violence matters: the case for appointed counsel in protective order proceedings

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14400

Record ID: 416ede85-bd9b-4b1f-b82f-f6281fe39190

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Balos, Beverley	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:12:53Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:12:53Z	-
dc.date.issued	2006	en
dc.identifier.citation	(557), 2006	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14400	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.subject	Legislation analysis	en
dc.subject	Legal issues	en
dc.title	Domestic violence matters: the case for appointed counsel in protective order proceedings	en
dc.title.alternative	Temple political & civil rights law review	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	3117	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.subject.keyword	International	en
dc.description.notes	This article reviews US Supreme Court's rulings on the right to counsel in civil cases. It challenges the view that would conclude that petitioners in protective order proceedings have no right to be appointed counsel and shows how Supreme Court jurisprudence supports victims of domestic violence have access to appointed counsel.	en
dc.identifier.source	Temple political & civil rights law review	en
dc.date.entered	2008-03-27	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing