Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14423
Record ID: 633008c8-1a19-497a-b4f4-4fc8ffd44989
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Sarahen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:13:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:13:01Z-
dc.date.issued2001en
dc.identifier.citation15 (3), November 2001en
dc.identifier.issn0817-623Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14423-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherButterworthsen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.titleDomestic violence, contributions and s 75(2) considerations: an analysis of unreported property judgementsen
dc.title.alternativeAustralian journal of family lawen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2020en
dc.subject.keywordTasmaniaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesOutlines and discusses the outcomes of 35 unreported decisions of the Family Court, between 1996 and 1999, in which allegations of violence were raised in proceedings pursuant to s 75 (2) of the Family Law Act. The principles expounded in the reported decisions of In the Marriage of Doherty and In The Marriage of Kennon, where it was first recognised that domestic violence may be a factor that increases the substantial contribution made, by the victim, to the family’s welfare, are discussed in the context of s 79 (4) (c) as are the various rules courts have developed in order to adjust property settlements under s 75 (2), which deals with the financial consequences of domestic violence. The court’s response to counter allegations of violence and/or misconduct is dealt with in the final section of the paper and it is argued that although the relevance of domestic violence to property disputes has significantly increased in recent years, the issue is under-represented in Family Court proceedings and the legal profession has been slow to embrace promising case law developments. It is suggested that the unreported status of the judgements in which developing principles are being clarified and applied, is a possible reason for this.en
dc.identifier.sourceAustralian journal of family lawen
dc.date.entered2002-07-15en
dc.publisher.placeChatswood, NSWen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing