Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14424
Record ID: 5834c495-274e-47a4-abf1-c9941e606983
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeuffert, Nanen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:13:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:13:02Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation23 (1), April 1999en
dc.identifier.issn0025-8938en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14424-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMelbourne University Law Review Associationen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.titleDomestic violence, discourses of romantic love, and complex personhood in the lawen
dc.title.alternativeMelbourne University law reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1719en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MULR/1999/8.htmlen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.description.notesThis article challenges the assumption that regards contradictory to love, men who have been physically, psychologically and sexually abusive. Such an assumption is utilised to question the veracity of the abuse and the credibility of the victim. Dominant discourses of romantic love are explored to understand the statements of love of women who kill their abusers. The lack of common law precedents about relationships and love is discussed to highlight the law’s narrow recognition of relationships as functions of property. Finally, the courtroom dynamics in which women’s account of love are constructed as unreasonable are examined.en
dc.identifier.sourceMelbourne University law reviewen
dc.date.entered2003-07-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing