Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14460
Record ID: 884d1d54-5005-4dd0-ae5a-1c8628307ec5
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWard, Emmaen
dc.contributor.authorTruong, Mandyen
dc.contributor.authorYeganeh, Ladanen
dc.contributor.authorCartwright, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Joseph E.en
dc.contributor.authorBugeja, Lyndalen
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Myrnaen
dc.contributor.authorCuschieri, Dominiqueen
dc.coverage.spatialInternational (including Australia)en
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:13:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:13:13Z-
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14460-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Domestic/family homicide (D/FH) is a global social, economic and public health problem. To date, the research studies into risk factors associated with D/FH has largely focused on intimate partner homicide (IPH). A more contemporary approach recognizes that D/FH extends beyond the intimate partner relationship. This systematic review sought to identify and quantify the individual, relationship, community and societal factors in the empirical evidence literature on D/FH. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched from January 1999 to December 2020. Published journal articles on studies of D/FH were included if the study included victims and/or perpetrator of D/FH, reported risk and/or protective factors associated with D/FH, reported primary data and was published in English. Factors were descriptively synthesized by the categories of the social ecological model and D/FH sub-type. Results: Three hundred and forty published articles met the inclusion criteria. From 1999 to 2020 the number of articles on D/FH increased globally from 10 to 40 respectively, declining to 23 in 2020. Almost half of the articles examined populations located in the Americas (160, 47.1%), predominately the United States and the majority of articles used quantitative designs (277, 81.5%). The forms of homicide more commonly studied were intimate partner (171, 50.3%), and filicide (98, 28.8%). Approximately 90% of articles reported individual victim and perpetrator factors, 64.7% examined relationship factors, 17.9% examined community factors and 15.6% examined societal factors. Conclusion: To inform universal and targeted D/FH elimination and prevention strategies, more research across different regions and a greater emphasis on community and societal-level factors is needed.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofTrauma, Violence, & Abuseen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.subject.otherUnderstanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impactsen
dc.titleDomestic/family homicide: A systematic review of empirical evidenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid17289en
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15248380221082084en
dc.subject.readinglistOtheren
dc.subject.readinglistUnderstanding victimisation and perpetration, and their impactsen
dc.subject.readinglistGeneral populationen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2022 May 26en
dc.subject.readinglistInternational (including Australia)en
dc.date.entered2022-05-19en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2022 May 26en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing