Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14462 Record ID: 10f1cc6d-bb69-4a27-8950-1fd441aa781c
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Clark, James J | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Walker, Robert | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:13:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:13:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 17 (12), December 2011 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1077-8012 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14462 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en |
| dc.subject | Standards | en |
| dc.subject | Service provision | en |
| dc.title | Don’t just widen one lens; instead use many: a response to Cerulli, Conte, Cromer and Newman, and Mulla and Hlavka | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Violence against women | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 2699 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.description.notes | This paper responds to the commentaries offered by Mulla and Hlavka, Conte, Cerulli, and Cromer and Newman. We reflect on their differing points of view, attempt clarifications, and then re-state our central concern in regard to research ethics in studies of violence against women. We think that IRB-oriented approaches suffer from too much rule adherence, too much focus on doing things the right way and too little attention to the larger ethical question of to how figure out the right things to do. We continue to raise concern about inept research as potentially damaging to a class of persons, not to the specific subjects of any particular study.<br/ ><br/ >Thus, we see not just a matter of poor design, mishandling of analyses, or even of clumsy inferences from the data in some research; these errors are correctible by better training and review. But these errors also have the potential for misleading the public and policy makers and thus suggest ethical dimensions to clumsy work.<br/ ><br/ >We conclude by proposing use of wide reflective equilibrium as a way of entering into deeper dialogue about the complex ethical issues surrounding this field of research. Hopefully, we can move beyond mere rule compliance to seriously considering the end effects of our science.<br/ >[?2011 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href=" http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal200837" target="_blank">SAGE Publications link</a>.] | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Violence against women | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2012-08-31 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.