Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14489
Record ID: 5dbde2a6-4e8a-4dd7-bc71-d060a85b1697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBreckenridge, Janen
dc.contributor.authorHoge, Gretchen Len
dc.contributor.authorChung, Donnaen
dc.contributor.authorSharp-Jeffs, Nicolaen
dc.contributor.authorPostmus, Judy Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:13:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:13:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.citationVolume 21, Issue 2en
dc.identifier.citation[OnlineFirst], 27 March 2018en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14489-
dc.description.abstractThe predominant perception of intimate partner violence (IPV) as constituting physical violence can still dominate, particularly in research and media reports, despite research documenting multiple forms of IPV including sexual violence occurring between intimate partners and various forms of psychological and emotional abuse. One frequently hidden or “invisible” form of abuse perpetrated within intimate partner relationships is economic abuse, also referred to as financial abuse in much of the literature. While the links between gendered economic insecurity and economic abuse are emerging, there remains a lack of consistency about definitions within the United States and globally, as there is no agreed upon index with which to measure economic abuse. As such, the purpose of this article is to review and analyze the global literature focused on either economic or financial abuse to determine how it is defined and what measures are used to capture its prevalence and impact. The 46 peer-reviewed articles that met all inclusion criteria for analysis came from a range of countries across six continents. Our review found that there is growing clarity and consistency of terminologies being used in these articles and found some consistency in the use of validated measures. Since this research is in its “infancy,” we need to have stronger collaborative efforts to use similar measures and terminology. Part of that collaborative effort is to consider how language and cultural differences may play a part in our understanding of economic abuse.<br/ ><br/ >Keywords: domestic violence, battered womenen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofTrauma, Violence, & Abuseen
dc.subjectEconomic securityen
dc.subjectFinancial abuseen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.subjectLiterature reviewen
dc.subjectIntimate partner violenceen
dc.subjectEconomic abuseen
dc.subjectTerminologyen
dc.titleEconomic abuse as an invisible form of domestic violence : a multicountry reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid15082en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1524838018764160en
dc.subject.keywordDomestic violenceen
dc.subject.keywordTerminology as Topicen
dc.subject.keywordEconomic abuseen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordLiterature reviewsen
dc.subject.keywordintimate partner violenceen
dc.subject.keywordMeasurementen
dc.subject.keywordFinancial abuseen
dc.subject.keywordEconomic securityen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1524838018764160en
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2020 September 24en
dc.description.notes<p>The purpose of this article is to review and analyze the global literature focused on either economic or financial abuse to determine how it is defined and what measures are used to capture its prevalence and impact.<br />&nbsp;</p>en
dc.identifier.sourceTrauma, violence & abuseen
dc.date.entered2018-04-05en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2020 September 24en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing