Enforcer, manager or leader? The judicial role in family violence courts

King, M; Batagol, B

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14563

Record ID: aa483105-f4fb-4354-b11d-0de4f13ffd5a

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	King, M	en
dc.contributor.author	Batagol, B	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:13:51Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:13:51Z	-
dc.date.issued	2010	en
dc.identifier.citation	No 5-6 Vol.: 33	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14563	-
dc.format	Pages 406-416	en
dc.language	en	en
dc.title	Enforcer, manager or leader? The judicial role in family violence courts	en
dc.title.alternative	International Journal of Law and Psychiatry	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	12349	en
dc.identifier.url	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78649358416&partnerID=40&md5=e8b5a5c3f612ea3be92824dec0fa6081	en
dc.subject.keyword	Australia	en
dc.subject.keyword	Behaviour Therapy	en
dc.subject.keyword	Spouse Abuse	en
dc.subject.keyword	Judicial Role	en
dc.subject.keyword	Prognosis	en
dc.subject.keyword	Mental Disorders	en
dc.subject.keyword	Defense mechanisms	en
dc.subject.keyword	Decision making	en
dc.subject.keyword	Victims of crime	en
dc.subject.keyword	Feminism	en
dc.subject.keyword	Domestic violence	en
dc.subject.keyword	Social justice	en
dc.subject.keyword	Cognitive therapy	en
dc.subject.keyword	Invalid URL	en
dc.subject.keyword	Patient Compliance	en
dc.subject.keyword	Professional-Patient Relations	en
dc.subject.keyword	Motivation	en
dc.subject.keyword	Courts	en
dc.subject.keyword	Prisoners	en
dc.subject.keyword	Jurisprudence	en
dc.subject.keyword	Criminal behaviour	en
dc.subject.keyword	Safety	en
dc.subject.keyword	Leadership	en
dc.subject.keyword	Paternalism	en
dc.subject.keyword	Reinforcement	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Manager	en
dc.subject.keyword	Behaviour change	en
dc.description.notes	Judicial supervision of offenders is an important component of many family violence courts. Skepticism concerning the ability of offenders to reform and a desire to protect victims has led to some judges to use supervision as a form of deterrence. Supervision is also used to hold offenders accountable for following court orders. Some family violence courts apply processes used in drug courts, such as rewards and sanctions, to promote offender rehabilitation. This article suggests that while protection and support of victims should be the prime concern of family violence courts, a form of judging that engages offenders in the development and implementation of solutions for their problems and supports their implementation is more likely to promote their positive behavioral change than other approaches to judicial supervision. The approach to judging proposed in this article draws from therapeutic jurisprudence, feminist theory, transformational leadership and solution-focused brief therapy principles. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.<br/ >Export Date: 22 July 2013Source: Scopus	en
dc.identifier.source	International Journal of Law and Psychiatry	en
dc.date.entered	2014-07-21	en
dc.description.physicaldescription	Pages 406-416	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Show simple item record

Google Scholar^TM

Who's citing

Google ScholarTM

Google Scholar^TM