Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14593
Record ID: 2cdd1340-d147-4d72-9a7d-78de3ca541d4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGondolf, Edward Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:14:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:14:02Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation9, 2004en
dc.identifier.issn1359-1789en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14593-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectCounsellingen
dc.titleEvaluating batterer counseling programs: a difficult task showing some effects and implicationsen
dc.title.alternativeAggression and violent behavioren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1217en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis article describes summaries and meta-analyses of evaluations of more than 40 batterer programmes in the US, which suggested little or no programme effect on preventing re-assaults. It refers to methodological issues such as programme definitions, measurement of outcomes, research designs, meta-analyses and experimental limitations. It discusses a longitudinal 4-year follow-up evaluation in 4 US cities (multisite evaluation), which indicates a moderate programme effect. It found a decline in re-assault but about 20% continuously re-assaulted. Problems in implementing follow-ups are mentioned, including the low response rates of female partners and the low programme completion rates. The meta-analyses question the excessive claims of success and found that there is no substantial evidence that most programmes are highly effective. The multisite evaluation found that a quarter of the men (about half of those who re-assaulted during the 4-year follow-up), re-assaulted their partners. Most began their re-assaults shortly after programme intake. Repeat re-assaulters did not seem distinct from the ‘batterer type’. The factor which distinguished them was the lack of response to them. Their partners were less likely to take action. The article suggests that more extensive case management and victim contact might reveal repeated re-assaults, and decisive intervention for the initial reassault could also reduce repeated re-assaults. It concludes that some batterer programmes appear to contribute to the reduction of re-assault but that this seems to be related to the intervention system of which the programme is part.en
dc.identifier.sourceAggression and violent behavioren
dc.date.entered2005-05-14en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing