Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14649
Record ID: af92aeaa-ec35-45ad-aefe-d019bcc04f56
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharman, Leah Sen
dc.contributor.authorDingle, Genevieve Aen
dc.contributor.authorSheeran, Nicolaen
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Heather A.en
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Elizabethen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:14:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:14:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.issn1552-6518en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14649-
dc.description.abstractReproductive coercion is any interference with a person’s reproductive autonomy that seeks to control if and when they become pregnant, and whether the pregnancy is maintained or terminated. It includes sabotage of contraceptive methods and intervention in a woman’s access to health care. Our study sought to explore the prevalence and associations with reproductive coercion within Queensland, Australia, where legislation addressing domestic violence and abortion are largely state based and undergoing a period of law reform. The study was a retrospective analysis of 3,117 Queensland women who contacted a telephone counseling and information service regarding an unplanned pregnancy. All data were collected by experienced counselors regarding circumstances within a current pregnancy between January 2015 and July 2017. Overall, experience of current domestic violence was significantly more likely to co-occur with reproductive coercion (21.1%) compared with reproductive coercion identified in the absence of other domestic violence (3.1%). Furthermore, significantly more mental health issues were reported by 36.6% of women affected by reproductive coercion, compared with 14.1% of women with no reproductive coercion present. Disclosure for reproductive coercion, violence, and mental health issues was much higher among women who made a repeat contact to the counselors about their pregnancy (17.8%) compared with those who disclosed at first contact (5.9%). These findings demonstrate the importance for health services to ensure that appropriate screening (and re-screening) for reproductive coercion is completed as a distinct part of screening for violence during a health care relationship.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interpersonal Violenceen
dc.subjectIntimate partner violenceen
dc.subjectDomestic violenceen
dc.subjectUnplanned pregnancyen
dc.subjectMental healthen
dc.titleExperiences of Reproductive Coercion in Queensland Womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid15618en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notes<p>Subscription required for access.</p>en
dc.date.entered2019-10-04en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing