Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14652 Record ID: cac16f04-c673-4516-88f0-929a787a50b6
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Schuller, Regina A | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:14:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:14:22Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 10 (223), 2003 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14652 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Duke Law School | en |
| dc.subject | Advocacy | en |
| dc.subject | Homicide | en |
| dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
| dc.title | Expert evidence and its impact on jurors' decisions in homicide trials involving battered women | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Duke journal of gender law & policy | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 1024 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?10+Duke+J.+Gender+L.+&+Pol%27y+225 | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
| dc.description.notes | This article analyses the limitations of expert testimony in homicide cases where women have raised battered woman syndrome as a defence in the US. Feminists' concerns are considered by looking at social psychological research which investigated the impact of testimony on mock jurors' decisions in homicide trials involving battered women. Such research suggests that the use of battered woman syndrome evidence is associated with positive effects for individual battered women but the findings also highlight some shortcomings such as interpretations of dysfunction and pathology. In contrast, research that looked at a form of expert testimony by focusing on the social context of a battered woman's experiences was not found to be associated with interpretations of dysfunction. Part I gives an overview of the difficulties faced by battered women when raising self-defence. Part II describes the battered woman syndrome evidence and the rationale for its application. Part III highlights the limitations with the use of battered woman syndrome evidence, including various reformulations of the testimony in light of these limitations. Part IV reviews the social psychological research on the impact of alternative forms of expert evidence on jurors' decisions in homicide trials with battered women. Part V outlines the implications and concludes that expert testimony on battering needs to shift from the psychological focus of current battered woman syndrome evidence to a conceptualisation that focuses on the social reality and context of battered women's lives. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Duke journal of gender law & policy | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2006-08-31 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.