Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14669
Record ID: 5388f4cb-cbcf-46c1-9000-06d81842b6ff
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Samantha Roseen
dc.contributor.authorVassos, Sevien
dc.contributor.authorAfrouz, Rojanen
dc.coverage.spatialVicen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:14:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:14:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.issn0312-407Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14669-
dc.description.abstractTechnology-facilitated domestic abuse is an insidious form of intimate partner violence with widespread impact on women, children, and communities. Yet little is known about how family violence practitioners respond to technology-facilitated domestic abuse, particularly in rural and regional contexts. This article reports on a small-scale qualitative study exploring technology-facilitated domestic abuse—related practice experiences of seven female-identifying social workers practising within regional Victorian family violence services. The study identifies that technology-facilitated domestic abuse is often nebulous and immune to available legal and social support remedies. The study findings invariably point to fundamental flaws in the policy and legal structures that shape family violence services. IMPLICATIONS Additional research that employs a mixed-method approach and a larger sample would enable a more comprehensive exploration of the prevalence, patterns, nature, and consequences of technology-facilitated domestic abuse. Family violence policies, legislation, and practice responses need to evolve in ways that better target technology-facilitated domestic abuse and its impact on women, children, and communities.The systematic review and evidence-informed development of professional training is needed for front-line workers to feel confident to address technology-facilitated domestic abuse.en
dc.languageenen
dc.subject.otherANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projectsen
dc.titleExploring rural and regional social workers’ perceptions and practices of technology-facilitated domestic abuseen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid17125en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.readinglistTechnology-facilitated abuseen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Completed Register of Active Research projectsen
dc.subject.readinglistVicen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16en
dc.subject.readinglistHealth, primary care and specialist service responsesen
dc.description.notes<p>This research was included in the ANROWS Register of Active Research (RAR). The research has concluded and the output has been added to the ANROWS library.<br /><br />Please visit <a href="https://www.anrows.org.au/register-of-active-and-recent/">https://www.anrows.org.au/register-of-active-research/</a> for more information on the RAR.</p><p><strong>PROJECT START DATE</strong></p><p>July 2021</p><p><strong>EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE</strong></p><p>June 2022</p>en
dc.date.entered2021-11-15en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 November 16en
dc.subject.anratopicTechnology-facilitated abuseen
dc.subject.anratopicHealth, primary care and specialist service responsesen
Appears in Collections:ANROWS Notepad 2021
Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing