Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14714
Record ID: 5bec0551-f496-4de1-8b3c-7ca20c01caf3
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Golding, Jonathan M | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hodell, Emily C | en |
dc.contributor.author | Wasarhaley, Nesa E | en |
dc.contributor.author | Dunlap, Emily E | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:14:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:14:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | 18 (2), May 2012 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1076-8971 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14714 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | American Psychological Association | en |
dc.subject | Criminal justice responses | en |
dc.subject | Homicide | en |
dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
dc.subject | Policy | en |
dc.title | Factors impacting juror perceptions of battered women who kill their abusers: delay and sleeping status | en |
dc.title.alternative | Psychology, Public Policy, and Law | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 2654 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
dc.subject.keyword | International | en |
dc.description.notes | This US article examines the factors that influence jury decisions in cases where women who have been victims of intimate partner violence have killed their partner and subsequently pleaded self defence in court proceedings. The authors provide a literature and policy review detailing that historical trends in prosecuting women who have killed their abusive partner. This is followed by methods, results and findings of a study of 171 jurors' perceptions in a mock trial. The research specifically examined juror (or participant) gender, delay between perpetrator's violent action and subsequent homicide, and whether the violent partner was asleep or awake during the homicide. The study also examined jurors' (or participants') reasons for decisions. The discussion considers policy changes in view of the findings. | en |
dc.identifier.source | Psychology, Public Policy, and Law | en |
dc.date.entered | 2013-01-14 | en |
dc.publisher.place | Washington, DC | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.