Family law mediation: compromising justice for women?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14743

Record ID: 97a65f69-d97c-4b00-9d9c-41ff855e27ca

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Downey, Claire	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:14:57Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:14:57Z	-
dc.date.issued	2000	en
dc.identifier.citation	(8), July 2000	en
dc.identifier.issn	1327-5550	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14743	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	CASA House (Centre Against Sexual Assault)	en
dc.subject	Family law	en
dc.title	Family law mediation: compromising justice for women?	en
dc.title.alternative	Women against violence : an Australian feminist journal	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	2364	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	National	en
dc.description.notes	Presents three feminist critiques of mediation which focus on the gendered power imbalance in mediation, specific concerns around issues of domestic violence and issues of privatization of justice for women. Suggests that any model of dispute resolution which is to serve women’s needs must strike a balance between the needs of individuals, and the strategic and specific gender needs of women. Proposes this balance can be achieved by legislating women’s basic entitlements upon separation, thereby reducing the uncertainty of legal entitlements and providing women with an effective bargaining tool in mediation.	en
dc.identifier.source	Women against violence : an Australian feminist journal	en
dc.date.entered	2001-01-10	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing