Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14836
Record ID: c6257e79-92b3-46e7-881d-3358df64632c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZannettino, Lanaen
dc.contributor.authorChung, Donnaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:15:29Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:15:29Z-
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citation(18), 2006en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14836-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectPerpetrator programsen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titleFeminists researching domestic violence perpetrator programs: improving women's and children's safety or misplaced effort?en
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid957en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordDuplicateen
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.description.notesIt is increasingly argued that feminist research about men’s violence is an important strategy in achieving the ultimate goal of ending violence against women and children. However, the conduct of feminist research that focuses on male perpetrators is not without its tensions and ethical dilemmas. Using two of the key findings from our research examining Australian domestic violence perpetrator programs, we discuss how feminism influenced the various aspects of the research process and highlight some of the methodological and ethical issues we encountered in conducting feminist research in this area.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2007-03-15en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing