Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14924
Record ID: 0f46e7b5-5d16-4f21-9576-cdfb535dd78e
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Michael Pen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:15:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:15:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citation16 (4), July-August 2011en
dc.identifier.issn1359-1789en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14924-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen
dc.subjectRepresentations of womenen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.subjectOverviewen
dc.titleGender and types of intimate partner violence: a response to an anti-feminist literature reviewen
dc.title.alternativeAggression and violent behavioren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid487en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis article is part of a series of related articles in a special edition of the Aggression and Violent Behavior journal, ‘Current Controversies on the Role of Gender in Partner Violence’.<br/ >In this article, the author sets out a feminist perspective on three types of intimate partner violence, intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. The author then draws on theory and research to rebut arguments against feminist theory in domestic violence. In both areas, the author comments on problems with research including bias and sample selection.en
dc.identifier.sourceAggression and violent behavioren
dc.date.entered2011-08-23en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing