Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14963
Record ID: 961eed69-709c-4e0a-8c36-ec3d166f352c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaly, Kathleenen
dc.contributor.authorCurtis-Fawley, Sarahen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:16:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:16:10Z-
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.identifier.citation11 (5), May 2005en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14963-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectAdvocacyen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectIndigenous issuesen
dc.subjectRestorative justiceen
dc.titleGendered violence and restorative justice: the views of victim advocatesen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1204en
dc.subject.keywordAustraliaen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordSouth Australiaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordQueenslanden
dc.description.notesThis article discusses the study on what victim advocates in South Australia and Queensland think about restorative justice in the context of gendered violence. The study’s methodology is outlined, which consists of interviews in Queensland and South Australia, archival analysis of nearly 400 sexual offence cases dealt with through the courts and conferences during 6? years in South Australia, and detailed analysis of 15 conferences of sexual assault and domestic violence in South Australia. It finds that although victim advocates have concerns about restorative justice, some saw positive aspects. A literature review including international literature of the debate concerning the use of alternatives to the criminal justice response to address violence against women is also provided. It concludes that criminal and restorative justice need not be treated mutually exclusive as ‘either/or’, and the way forward is to recognise the potential and the limitations of each form of justice in order to develop policy and practice that will be responsive to the needs identified by victims and advocates.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2005-05-23en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing