Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14977
Record ID: c251114f-2e5f-4e23-b9f1-2d1fb163576c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuilter, Juliaen
dc.coverage.spatialNSWen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:16:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:16:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/14977-
dc.description.abstractFor the purposes of rape/sexual assault, the preferred approach for pursuing modernisation in Australia has been to legislate a positive definition of consent as ‘free and voluntary agreement’. The absence of consent in this form has become the primary touchstone for the crime. And yet, despite multiple waves of progressive legislative reform, too few victims of sexual violence find justice in the criminal courts. This article questions whether prevailing statutory models of consent definition may be more problem than solution. Drawing on the work of Pateman and Gatens in particular, I argue that while the repetition of the words ‘free and voluntary agreement’ make it a familiar and reassuring formula, its meaning is neither self-evident nor self-executing. It is possible that the definition opens a ‘gap’ between what is intended by the phrase and how it is filled in practice by the ‘common knowledges’ (Mariana Valverde, Law's Dream of a Common Knowledge (Princeton University Press, 2003)) of rape myths. Myth as ‘misunderstanding’ may be capable of legislative correction, but legislative correction of myth, understood as an excess of signification (Roland Barthes, Mythologies trans A Lavers (Jonathan Cape, 1972)), is elusive. The article also suggests that the practice of legislative correction may be flawed to the extent that it relies on naming and marking the limit of what consent is not – via categories of (exceptional) circumstance and vulnerability.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.titleGetting consent ‘right’: Sexual assault law reform in New South Walesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2021.1930434en
dc.identifier.catalogid17034en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2021 August 10en
dc.subject.readinglistGeneral populationen
dc.subject.readinglistPolicing and legal responsesen
dc.subject.readinglistNSWen
dc.date.entered2021-08-09en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2021 August 10en
dc.subject.anratopicPolicing and legal responsesen
dc.subject.anratopicSexual violenceen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing