Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15038
Record ID: 5a9d4732-c0c9-40b8-bfa7-0eba2fe49c00
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Jacquelyn Cen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:16:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:16:36Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citation19 (12), December 2004en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15038-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectAdvocacyen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.subjectHomicideen
dc.subjectHousingen
dc.titleHelping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violenceen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1233en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis article discusses the findings from a national US study of homicide of women, which found that only about half of the 456 women killed or almost killed by a husband, boyfriend, ex-husband or ex-boyfriend had accurately perceived their risk of being killed by their abusive partner. Women were unlikely to overestimate their risk; many underestimated the severity of the situation. The US intimate partner femicide study found that domestic violence advocates had seen few of the victims of actual or attempted intimate partner femicide during the year before they were killed. They were more likely to have been seen in the health care system. Discussions on the findings relate to the criminal justice system, the health care system, and the advocacy and shelter system. It concludes that advocates, health professionals and criminal justice providers should regard the woman’s fear as an important sign of increased risk and to make safety planning, such as strong advocacy and risk-reduction strategies (extended shelter residence, removal of the batterer by incarceration, high bail or high-level probation supervision). It finds that the existing risk assessment instruments are not fully validated and will never be perfectly predictive.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2005-04-16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing