Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15074
Record ID: 4a2840a8-c3fc-432e-9217-8164b437f6bd
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFitz-Gibbon, Kateen
dc.contributor.authorPickering, Sen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:16:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:16:48Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationNo 1 Vol.: 52en
dc.identifier.issn0007-0955en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15074-
dc.formatPages 159-180en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleHomicide Law Reform in Victoria, Australiaen
dc.title.alternativeBritish Journal of Criminologyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azr060<Goen
dc.identifier.catalogid12391en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordDuplicateen
dc.relation.urltoen
dc.relation.urlISI>://WOS:000297858100009en
dc.description.notesHomicide law reform surrounding the partial defences to murder currently animates legal stakeholders in Australia and the United Kingdom, particularly in relation to cases of lethal intimate partner violence. In 2005, the Victorian Government implemented a series of homicide law reforms, central to which was the abolition of the partial defence of provocation and the instatement of an offence of defensive homicide. This article, based on a larger qualitative research study with British, Victorian and New South Wales legal stakeholders, explores experiences and perceptions of reforms in Victoria. An analysis of the impact of homicide law reform, using Hudson's principles of discursiveness and reflectiveness as a framework for analysis, reveals some dissonance between the intent and outcomes of these legal reforms. This study concludes that reforms crafted to counter gender bias in the operation of homicide law have produced mixed results for female victims of intimate partner homicide and related case law.<br/ >Electronic Resource Number:<br/ >10.1093/bjc/azr060<br/ >Times Cited: 8Fitz-Gibbon, Kate Pickering, Sharonen
dc.identifier.sourceBritish journal of criminologyen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 159-180en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing