Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15146
Record ID: 70889555-7ddd-4196-817f-aadbaeb499fb
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMinto, Kiaraen
dc.contributor.authorLouis, Winnifred R.en
dc.contributor.authorMasser, Barbara M.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:17:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:17:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15146-
dc.description.abstractWhile substantial research has been conducted on intimate partner violence (IPV), comparatively little research has examined peoples’ perceptions of which behaviors comprise this form of abuse. Early identification of IPV is critical to ending abuse, however, forms of IPV that typically occur earlier in a relationship (e.g., nonphysical abuse) may not be core components of peoples’ mental frameworks (schemas) of IPV and may therefore be less commonly identified as abusive. To explore this, in Study 1 participants from an Australian University (N = 86) separately described the relationships with IPV and nonphysical IPV. Analyses identified control, power imbalance, stereotypical gender dynamics (male perpetrator, female victim), physical abuse, and having a low socioeconomic status abuser as common components of participants’ IPV schema when not prompted with type of abuse. However, participants largely failed to describe nonphysical IPV behaviors, suggesting limited awareness of the specific behaviors that constitute abuse. To explore this in Study 2, participants from an Australian University (N = 305) were asked to categorize a range of specific behaviors (including physically abusive, nonphysically abusive, and nonabusive behaviors) as definitely, maybe, or never abusive. Drawing on the known positive association between gender and romantic beliefs with the experience of abuse, we also assessed the relationship of identification of IPV behaviors to these beliefs. Moderated multilevel modeling showed that nonphysical IPV behaviors were generally perceived as less abusive than physical IPV behaviors. In addition, stronger endorsement of romantic jealousy was associated with evaluating nonphysical IPV as less abusive. However, romantic jealousy beliefs were not significantly associated with the perceived abusiveness of physical IPV behaviors. Findings support the conclusion that individuals’ IPV schemas contribute to a failure to identify nonphysical IPV behaviors as abusive, and this is particularly true for people who more strongly endorse romantic jealousy.<br/ ><br/ >Keywords:<br/ >anything related to domestic violence, domestic violence, perceptions of domestic violence, violence exposureen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Interpersonal Violenceen
dc.titleIdentifying Nonphysical Intimate Partner Violence in Relationships: The Role of Beliefs and Schemasen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520938505en
dc.identifier.catalogid16462en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.readinglistANROWS Notepad 2020 July 16en
dc.date.entered2020-07-20en
dc.subject.listANROWS Notepad 2020 July 16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing