Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207
Record ID: 111da2d9-1a5a-446a-adc6-413340432a2b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Cynthia Len
dc.contributor.authorChang, Judy Cen
dc.contributor.authorDado, Dianeen
dc.contributor.authorSchussler, Saraen
dc.contributor.authorHawker, Lynnen
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Jessica Gen
dc.contributor.authorCluss, Patricia Aen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:17:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:17:35Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citation88 (3), September 2012en
dc.identifier.issn0738-3991en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15207-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Scienceen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.titleIn person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patientsen
dc.title.alternativePatient education and counselingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid284en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesThis journal article contains the findings of a study which compared computerised screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) with face-to-face interviews with obstetric care providers. The participants’ feedback led to the conclusion that both forms of screening were valuable and should be used in tandem. Computerised screening allows for higher rates disclosure of IPV due to its confidential nature and the absence of fear of judgement. Face-to-face screening provides greater flexibility and nuance in interview scenarios.en
dc.identifier.sourcePatient education and counselingen
dc.date.entered2013-01-03en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing