Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15220 Record ID: cf4aadbf-f5a2-4e9f-b0d9-b997cbd6e968
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wangmann, Jane | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:17:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:17:39Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | No 4 Vol.: 34 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15220 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.title | Incidents v context : how does the NSW protection order system understand intimate partner violence? | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Federal law review | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 12213 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_4/05_Wangmann_ProtectionOrderSystem.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Legal | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Domestic violence | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Victims | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.description.notes | Civil protection order schemes were introduced in many western countries from the 1970s; in Australia from the 1980s. One of the key drivers for this development was the extensive feminist criticism of the criminal law which revealed that it failed to respond adequately to the particular harm of intimate partner violence ('IPV'). The nature of IPV as a gendered, repetitive and patterned harm, motivated by control, found a poor fit with the criminal law's focus on discrete incidents and its traditional emphasis on visible forms of violence. This article explores whether the New South Wales (NSW) civil protection order system (Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders or 'ADVOs'), despite a range of progressive elements, continues to mirror the criminal law's narrow understanding of IPV. It does so through a case study on cross-applications in NSW ADVO proceedings. This study reveals that the progressive promise of the ADVO system to look beyond the lens of the criminal law is militated by a range of factors such as: the limited nature of the complaint narrative; the continuing focus in practice on incidents of violence; and the constraints of the court environment | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Federal law review | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2014-07-21 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.