Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15221 Record ID: ad837817-5ea9-4ef6-8756-a064d84ed3e0
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wangmann, Jane | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:17:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:17:40Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | 34 (4), December 2012 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0082-0512 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15221 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Law | en |
| dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
| dc.subject | Policing | en |
| dc.subject | Legislation analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Protection orders | en |
| dc.title | Incidents v context: how does the NSW protection order system understand intimate partner violence? | en |
| dc.title.alternative | The Sydney law review | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 224 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_4/05_Wangmann_ProtectionOrderSystem.pdf | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | National | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.description.notes | This Australian article critiques the ways in which civil protection order systems, like the criminal law, continue to focus on discrete incidents of domestic violence rather than patterns of control. The author argues that although civil protection order systems have the potential to move beyond the criminal law’s traditional emphasis on physical violence and single acts, there has tended to be an implementation gap between feminist law reform efforts in this area and legal systems and practice.<br/ ><br/ >The article draws on a case study of cross applications in New South Wales (NSW) Apprehended Domestic Violence Order (ADVO) proceedings. The case study involved: in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 10 women (the study was unsuccessful in recruiting men for interview) and 27 professionals in the legal system; a documentary analysis of 12 months of court files from three large metropolitan courts (78 cross applications or 156 single applications); and court observations (73 ADVO mentions and two contested hearings). | en |
| dc.identifier.source | The Sydney law review | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2013-10-25 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | University of Sydney | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.