Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15232
Record ID: c92d84e5-443b-4c8c-98c7-f87e714c599c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPierotti, Rachael Sen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:17:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:17:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citation78 (2), April 2013en
dc.identifier.issn0003-1224en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15232-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.titleIncreasing rejection of intimate partner violence: evidence of global cultural diffusionen
dc.title.alternativeAmerican Sociological Reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2601en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis study extends existing world society research on ideational diffusion by going beyond examinations of national policy change to investigate the spread of ideas among nonelite individuals. Specifically, I test whether recent trends in women’s attitudes about intimate partner violence are converging toward global cultural scripts. Results suggest that global norms regarding violence against women are reaching citizens worldwide, including in some of the least privileged parts of the globe. During the first decade of the 2000s, women in 23 of the 26 countries studied became more likely to reject intimate partner violence. Structural socioeconomic or demographic changes, such as urbanization, rising educational attainment, increasing media access, and cohort replacement, fail to explain the majority of the observed trend. Rather, women of all ages and social locations became less likely to accept justifications for intimate partner violence. The near uniformity of the trend and speed of the change in attitudes about intimate partner violence suggest that global cultural diffusion has played an important role.<br/ >[Copyright ? 2013 by SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href="http://asr.sagepub.com/" target="_blank">SAGE Publications link</a>.]en
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Sociological Reviewen
dc.date.entered2013-09-06en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing