Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15375
Record ID: ec174878-f100-4495-ba85-141369d0e11d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Kelsey Len
dc.contributor.authorTaft, Angela Jen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:18:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:18:40Z-
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citation304 (5), August 4, 2010en
dc.identifier.issn0098-7484en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15375-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Associationen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectCross-culturalen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectCounsellingen
dc.titleIntimate partner violence against women: what outcomes are meaningful?en
dc.title.alternativeJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Associationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid433en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThis editorial comments on the challenges and issues for consideration when attempting to measure meaningful clinical outcomes of interventions for victims of intimate partner violence, specifically drawing on the findings from a study conducted in Hong Kong.en
dc.identifier.sourceJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Associationen
dc.date.entered2011-12-01en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing