Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15459
Record ID: 0422f79e-4057-46a1-a097-ed2a668fe215
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLogan, T Ken
dc.contributor.authorCole, Jenniferen
dc.contributor.authorShannon, Lisaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:16Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citation22 (9), September 2007en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15459-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectCommunity attitudesen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleIntimate partner violence, relationship status, and protective orders: does "living in sin" entail a different experienceen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid832en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesThe legal status of women's intimate relationships may allow for different experiences with intimate partner violence (IPV) and the protections received from the criminal justice system. There has been limited research examining differences in IPV and protective orders for women in marital and cohabiting intimate relationships. This study examines differences in experiences with IPV and factors related to protective orders: stipulations, violations, and perceived efficacy in a sample of married (n = 392) and cohabiting (n = 307) women with protective orders. Results suggest (a) married and cohabiting women are significantly different on a number of demographic characteristics; however, after controlling for these demographic differences, (b) married and cohabiting women's experiences with IPV are similar in almost all dimensions, except with the psychological tactic of degradation; and (c) married and cohabiting women receive similar protective order stipulations, experience similar rates of violations, and have the same overall perceptions of safety, freedom, and effectiveness pertaining to the domestic violence order. Implications for policy are discussed.<br/ ><br/ >[?2007 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href="http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdManSub.nav?prodId=Journal200855" target="_blank">SAGE Publications link</a>.]en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2008-01-10en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing