Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15477
Record ID: 42c39a33-cfe3-412c-9202-5548852e1b6f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHare, Sara Cen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:24Z-
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citation25 (8), November 2010en
dc.identifier.issn0885-7482en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15477-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringer Publishingen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.titleIntimate partner violence: victims' opinions about going to trialen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of family violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2903en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesCriminal justice officials assume that intimate partner violence victims oppose filing charges against their abusers. In a study of 94 respondents, reluctance actually occurred with the prospect of going to trial. While 70% supported filing charges, only 37% wanted a trial. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses help explain the reasons women gave for their opinions about trials. The strongest quantitative predictor was that as the level of the victim's injury sustained from the crime increased, their support for a trial increased. Gondolf and Fisher's (1988) survivor theory predicted factors that influenced victims' support or opposition to a trial in the quantitative section. The nested ecological model explained approximately half of the open-ended responses to those opposing trials while the goals of sentencing model articulated most victims' support for trials.<br/ >[?2010 Springer. All rights reserved. For further information, visit "http://www.springer.com/medicine/journal/10896".]en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of family violenceen
dc.date.entered2011-04-12en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing