Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15522
Record ID: c21afdd3-fb1a-47c0-9b2c-f89d9ee7631d
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Field, Rachael | en |
dc.contributor.author | Currie, Susan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Carpenter, Belinda | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:19:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:19:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15522 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.subject | Legislation analysis | en |
dc.subject | Protection orders | en |
dc.title | Issues for magistrates in the making of ouster orders under the Domestic Violence (Family Protection) Act, 1989 (Qld) | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 5581 | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/25226/20020606-0000/www.gu.edu.au/centre/flru/field.doc | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Electronic publication | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Queensland | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.description.notes | Paper presented at the ISFL 2000 (Brisbane) Conference<br/ >Reports findings of a survey conducted with Queensland Magistrates about their attitudes towards domestic violence. NSW Judicial Commission survey conducted with Magistrates in 1998 was used as the basis of the Queensland survey with additional questions incorporated to ascertain magistrates' views about the making of Ouster Orders (an order to prohibit the defendant from remaining or approaching a particular residence, including the family home). Results of the survey indicated that Magistrates made ouster orders when it was considered the circumstances were serious enough to warrant the making of the order, usually as a last resort. This included circumstances where serious physical violence had occurred and after determination of whether suitable accommodation existed for the woman and children. Magistrates indicated they would mostly issue an order when the respondent was present and had an opportunity to be heard. The authors suggest decisions possibly reflect an overriding concern with the rights of the respondent which may detract from ouster orders being used as an effective tool for the protection of women and children escaping domestic violence. | en |
dc.date.entered | 2001-06-26 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.