Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15527
Record ID: 81f7690e-6023-40f6-ba84-33a6a4803b40
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPattavina, Aprilen
dc.contributor.authorMorabito, Melissa Schaeferen
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Linda Men
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:47Z-
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citation[ahead-of-print], 20 Sept 2016en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15527-
dc.languageenen
dc.subjectVictims / survivorsen
dc.subjectSexual assaulten
dc.subjectPolicingen
dc.subjectPoliceen
dc.subjectCharacteristicsen
dc.titleIt all just piles up : challenges to victim credibility accumulate to influence sexual assault case processingen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid13482en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesExisting research on police discretion suggests that the police decision to arrest for sexual assault offenses can be influenced by a variety of legal and extra-legal factors particularly challenges to victim credibility. This study examines how the accumulation of behaviors, attributions, and characteristics affects police decision making. Using data collected from the Los Angeles Police Department and Sheriff's Department, one decision point, the arrest, is examined to fill this gap in the literature.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2016-09-26en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing