Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15540
Record ID: 38bd7f16-2251-434d-b398-e6ef2afff81a
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, Emmaen
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Amanda Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:52Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citation27 (8), May 2012en
dc.identifier.issn0886-2605en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15540-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectRisk factorsen
dc.subjectService provisionen
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten
dc.titleJudging risk: key determinants in British domestic violence casesen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid343en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesData from the largest study to date of the working practices of British victim support workers (known as Independent Domestic Violence Advisors or IDVAs) are used to provide insight into how "risk judgments" are made in cases of domestic violence. Using data from more than 2,000 victims, this study found a convergence between actuarial data and IDVAs' risk judgments when the risk score was high, but in cases with a lower risk score, IDVAs often used their professional judgment to upgrade risk.<br/ ><br/ >Next, we identified the specific factors underpinning IDVAs' risk judgments. Consistent with existing research, we found that IDVAs relied on a subset of available information when forming risk judgments, and characteristics of the abusive situation, such as the escalation of violence, use of weapons, stalking, and significant injuries, were particularly salient to them. Furthermore, IDVAs paid attention to victims' perceptions and when they felt very frightened or afraid of further injury then IDVAs were more likely to label them as high risk.<br/ ><br/ >Although we identified some encouraging overlap between the subset of factors informing risk judgments and those associated with victims' reabuse at a later date, some notable differences indicate a need for messages from research about the significance of particular risk factors to be reinforced to frontline practitioners on a regular basis.<br/ ><br/ >[?2012 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit <a href=" http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdManSub.nav?prodId=Journal200855" target="_blank">SAGE Publications link</a>.]en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of interpersonal violenceen
dc.date.entered2012-08-03en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing