Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15555
Record ID: 4743921a-f1a4-4e1d-a583-f6677f242f5c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLevett, Simonen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:19:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:19:59Z-
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citation30, May 2006en
dc.identifier.issn14477254en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15555-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLexisNexis Butterworthsen
dc.subjectLegislation analysisen
dc.subjectCross-culturalen
dc.titleKeeping domestic violence 'relevant': the significance of recent case lawen
dc.title.alternativeImmigration reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid3169en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.description.notesThis paper looks at new assessment provisions relating to domestic violence in the Migration Amendment Regulations 2005. It discusses how an overly formalistic approach to the provisions in the courts has clashed with contemporary understandings of domestic violence, and devalued the provisions for victims of domestic violence.en
dc.identifier.sourceImmigration reviewen
dc.date.entered2007-08-09en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing