Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15575
Record ID: 8ec26acd-c837-446a-bdce-b1f6e1832a01
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Joannaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:20:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:20:08Z-
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citation31 (3), September 2006en
dc.identifier.issn1037-969Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15575-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLegal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltden
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.subjectHuman rightsen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectPolicyen
dc.subjectProtection ordersen
dc.titleLaw reform: time for changeen
dc.title.alternativeAlternative law journalen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid647en
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesJournal is supported by Faculty of Law, Monash University.<br/ >General Overview: This article provides a summary of the Victorian Law Reform Commission’s Review of Family Violence Laws Report (2006), a review of Victoria’s Crimes (Family Violence) Act 1987.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: Former research and policy officer at the Victorian Law Reform Commission [VLRC], Joanna Carr, summarises the VLRC’s Review of Family Violence Laws Report, which found that the protection order system does not adequately protect those experiencing family violence.<br/ ><br/ >Guided by a human-rights based approach and informed particularly by United Nations human rights conventions, the VLRC made 153 recommendations. Carr discusses eight of these including adoption of a Family Violence Act. This would include a more comprehensive definition of family violence.<br/ ><br/ >The VLRC recommended increased legal advice, information and representation be made available to victims’ of domestic violence. In particular, it suggested that increased support for Indigenous women, migrant women and women with disabilities be prioritised. Relatedly, the VLRC recommended that information provided to women when filing for a protection order be in ‘plain English,’ to ensure their understanding.<br/ ><br/ >The Report also contains recommendations that during the court process, the safety and emotional well-being of the victim is considered. To decrease the distress of the victim, the respondent should be prevented from cross-examining the applicant in person, technologies such as closed circuit television should be used and the court room should be made private where necessary. All court staff and magistrates working in family violence should receive training in order to gain a fuller understanding of this.en
dc.identifier.sourceAlternative Law Journalen
dc.date.entered2009-11-27en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing