Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15580 Record ID: b91e13ab-29ea-4c60-84b6-13462bc2abad
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Banks, Cate | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:20:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:20:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | (12), 2009 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 18339077 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15580 | - |
| dc.language | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Australian Institute of Family Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Family law | en |
| dc.subject | Impact on children and young people | en |
| dc.subject | Legal issues | en |
| dc.title | Lawyers and family dispute resolution practitioners: achieving the child-focused ideal in practice | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Family relationships quarterly | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
| dc.identifier.catalogid | 5344 | en |
| dc.identifier.url | https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/cant-find-what-youre-looking | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Electronic publication | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Journal article/research paper | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Queensland | en |
| dc.relation.url | https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/cant-find-what-youre-looking | en |
| dc.description.notes | General Overview: Research findings are reported in this article by Cate Banks on the differing ways in which lawyers and Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) practitioners in Queensland define a child-focused approach to practice and perceive constraints to its implementation.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion:The research considered in this article was undertaken in the immediate aftermath of the introduction of the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006:(Cth) and focused on the concept of child-focused practice within the family law system. Researchers conducted thematic analyses of semi-structured interviews with 117 family law stakeholders, including lawyers, mediators, judicial officers and self-representing litigants. The article focuses on results obtained from lawyers and FDR practitioners.<br/ ><br/ >The research found that while lawyers and FDR practitioners share a commitment to child-focused practice and achieving the best interests of the child, there is not a clear, shared understanding of what such practice comprises. Thus, while lawyers define a child’s best interest in terms of legal outcomes and in accordance with the legislative framework, FDR practitioners favour an organic understanding of the child’s best interest within the context of the family system. Constraints to implementing child-focused practice identified by both sets of practitioners included the shared parenting provisions and client attitudes, with lawyers also citing their ethical obligations to clients and the court. In light of the findings presented, the author highlights the need for further research into the needs of different professional groups in implementing a child-focused approach within the family law system. | en |
| dc.identifier.source | Family relationships quarterly | en |
| dc.date.entered | 2010-01-15 | en |
| dc.publisher.place | Melbourne | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.