Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15606
Record ID: f28e11ec-7bc5-4d9a-8311-8ade85490848
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Douglas, Heather | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:20:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:20:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 18, no. 1 ; pp. 84-99 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15606 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article considers how legal engagement can be an opportunity to exercise coercive control over a former intimate partner. Drawing on interviews with 65 women who engaged with the legal system as a result of violence in their intimate relationships, this article explores how women’s engagement with the legal system is frequently experienced as an extension of an intimate partner’s coercive control. It builds on existing research showing how legal processes provide an opportunity for perpetrators to continue and even expand their repertoire of coercive and controlling behaviours post-separation. I refer to this as legal systems abuse. This article explores women’s reported experiences and considers how expectations of equality of access to justice and fair hearing; concepts that underpin legal processes, can be reconciled with legal engagements that seek to end coercive and controlling behaviours. The article concludes that improved understanding of domestic and family violence as coercive control by legal actors may help to circumvent the opportunities for legal systems abuse. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Sage journals | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Criminology & Criminal Justice | en |
dc.subject | Coercive control | en |
dc.subject | Legal processes | en |
dc.subject | Legislation | en |
dc.subject | Domestic violence | en |
dc.subject | Family violence | en |
dc.subject | Law | en |
dc.subject | Intimate partner violence | en |
dc.subject | Duress | en |
dc.title | Legal systems abuse and coercive control | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728380 | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 15124 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Coercive control | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Family violence | en |
dc.subject.keyword | intimate partner violence | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Domestic violence | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Legal procedures | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Duress | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Legislation | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Invalid URL | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Law | en |
dc.subject.readinglist | Policing and legal responses | en |
dc.description.notes | <p>This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship: FT140100796.</p> | en |
dc.identifier.source | Criminology & criminal justice : an international journal | en |
dc.date.entered | 2018-05-22 | en |
dc.subject.anratopic | Policing and legal responses | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.