Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15663
Record ID: a3ef764e-ba6a-4daa-8bf9-b4607aff35e2
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTolmie, Juliaen
dc.contributor.authorKaye, Mirandaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:20:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:20:44Z-
dc.date.issued1998en
dc.identifier.citation10 (1), July 1998en
dc.identifier.issn1034-5329en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15663-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Sydney, Institute of Criminologyen
dc.subjectProtection ordersen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectLegal issuesen
dc.subjectFamily lawen
dc.subjectCommunity attitudesen
dc.title'Lollies at a children's party' and other myths: violence, protection orders and fathers' rights groupsen
dc.title.alternativeCurrent issues in criminal justiceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1303en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordNationalen
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesDiscusses some commonly held beliefs and perceptions about domestic and family violence perpetuated by fathers’ rights groups and attempts to critique these ideas from an empirical standpoint. The notion that women frequently make false allegations of physical and/or sexual assault, that women often incite violence, that the Family Court victimises perpetrators of violence and that Apprehended Violence Orders are ‘handed out like lollies’ by the courts are challenged and the importance of discrediting claims like these is explained.en
dc.identifier.sourceCurrent issues in criminal justiceen
dc.date.entered2005-01-14en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing