Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15714
Record ID: 5bf6e65c-4fb0-4ecb-90b7-06e6d92617f3
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:21:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:21:04Z-
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationNo 4 Vol.: 6en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15714-
dc.formatPages 331-343en
dc.languageenen
dc.titleMale perpetrators, the gender symmetry debate, and the rejection-abuse cycle : implications for treatmenten
dc.title.alternativeAmerican Journal of Men's Healthen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid12309en
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861742497&partnerID=40&md5=db23597bc82135ba7c1ec2517e8ab5d8en
dc.subject.keywordFeminismen
dc.subject.keywordRisk Reduction Behavioren
dc.subject.keywordCrimeen
dc.subject.keywordVictimen
dc.subject.keywordNew South Walesen
dc.subject.keywordFemaleen
dc.subject.keywordwomen's rightsen
dc.subject.keywordMaleen
dc.subject.keywordpartner violenceen
dc.subject.keywordStatisticsen
dc.subject.keywordInvalid URLen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordrisk reductionen
dc.subject.keywordHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practiceen
dc.subject.keywordGender identityen
dc.subject.keywordSex differenceen
dc.subject.keywordAustraliaen
dc.subject.keywordSpouse Abuseen
dc.subject.keywordAttitude to Healthen
dc.subject.keywordFamily characteristicsen
dc.subject.keywordpsychological aspecten
dc.subject.keywordSex Factorsen
dc.subject.keywordReviewen
dc.subject.keywordVictims of crimeen
dc.description.notesThis review article examined the gender symmetry debate in light of recent research relating to the feminist and family research perspectives on intimate partner violence, providing a context for rethinking perpetrator programs. The concept of coercive control is considered as an explanatory factor in an attempt to integrate the feminist and family research perspectives. The limited effectiveness of perpetrator programs is examined. Research highlighting potential factors that could improve the effectiveness of perpetrator programs is introduced, followed by a discussion of the rejection-abuse cycle, one attempt to incorporate current research into a more inclusive program. The rejection-abuse cycle identifies a pattern of perpetrator behavior, which links rejection, threat to self, defense against threat, and abuse. Finally, suggestions for changing perpetrator programs are elaborated, incorporating past research, which would make them appropriate for both male and female perpetrators. These implications are contextualized within a meta-theory to provide greater clarity for the development of future perpetrator programs. © The Author(s) 2012.<br/ >Export Date: 23 July 2013Source: Scopusen
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Men's Healthen
dc.date.entered2014-07-21en
dc.description.physicaldescriptionPages 331-343en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing