Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15765
Record ID: 8a55883c-257f-4050-9514-afc76691e738
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGondolf, Edward Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:21:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:21:24Z-
dc.date.issued2003en
dc.identifier.citation18 (6), December 2003en
dc.identifier.issn0885-7482en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15765-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Plenum Publishersen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectTheories of violenceen
dc.titleMCMI results for batterers: Gondolf replies to Dutton's responseen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of family violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid1598en
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.description.notesResponding to criticisms directed at the author's use of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) in a previous study, this article outlines some of the key disadvantages of using the MCMI, including its adoption of an 'abusive personality' category and its capacity to encourage under-reporting. Goes on to answer some of these criticisms on the basis of the findings of the study and attachment theory.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of family violenceen
dc.date.entered2004-01-05en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing