Measuring crime victimisation, Australia : the impact of different collection methodologiesInformation Paper

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15769

Record ID: 7dcbc7d3-9fd6-481f-83f8-2c4d46716e85

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Andersson, Catherine	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:21:26Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:21:26Z	-
dc.date.issued	2004	en
dc.identifier.citation	4522.0.55.001	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15769	-
dc.format	26 p.	en
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Australian Bureau of Statistics	en
dc.subject	Measurement	en
dc.subject	Statistics	en
dc.title	Measuring crime victimisation, Australia : the impact of different collection methodologiesInformation Paper	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	1548	en
dc.identifier.url	https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/research/measuring-crime-victimisation-impact-different-collection-methodologies	en
dc.subject.keyword	National	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.subject.keyword	Statistics	en
dc.description.notes	Provides an overview of the various types of crime measurement used by researchers in Australia, identifying some of the reasons findings often differ, before discussing some of the consequences of employing discrepant methodologies. Advantages and disadvantages of each mode of measurement are examined, as are some of the factors such as question wording and sampling that can affect results. Diverging prevalence rates for victims of assault are used to illustrate some of these effects.	en
dc.date.entered	2004-03-22	en
dc.publisher.place	Canberra, ACT	en
dc.description.physicaldescription	26 p.	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing