Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15803
Record ID: a8a4be9a-5a19-47f7-90c9-4909e418dc4f
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFontana, Mikeen
dc.contributor.authorLaming, Chrisen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:21:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:21:39Z-
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.citation5 (4), Summer 2007en
dc.identifier.issn14480336en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15803-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherNew Community Quarterly Associationen
dc.subjectRestorative justiceen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.subjectPeer educationen
dc.subjectRegional rural and remote areasen
dc.titleMen’s Behaviour Change Programs in a regional and rural contexten
dc.title.alternativeNew Community Quarterlyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2983en
dc.subject.keywordVictoriaen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesGeneral Overview: This article discusses the role of Men’s Behaviour Change Programs [MBCPs] in a rural context, based on the authors’ experience of facilitating two MBCP’s in Gippsland, Victoria.<br/ ><br/ >Discussion: The authors discuss the challenges of running MBCPs. They contend that MBCPs can further compound family violence. To prevent this, the authors advocate for an integrated approach between MBCPs and other kinds of violence prevention services, ensuring accountability and transparency. They argue that an interagency approach will result in an informed sector where MBCPs’ work alongside already established community strategies to end family violence and are accountable to services for victims of violence.<br/ ><br/ >The authors advocate for consistency in the court system for both victims and perpetrators of family violence. They argue that men’s violence must be considered criminal yet rehabilitation needs to be prioritised. Furthermore, they argue that it is important for men to take responsibility for their own violence and do not recommend mandating men to attend MBCPs.<br/ ><br/ >The particularities of the two programs run in Gippsland are outlined. This includes information about the process of referral, the demographics of the men involved, components of the program, the way they are run and the philosophy that underpins them. The authors conclude by arguing for MBCPs as a legitimate and successful violence prevention strategy.en
dc.identifier.sourceNew Community Quarterlyen
dc.date.entered2009-12-04en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing