Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15826
Record ID: 00ee22b3-cfdc-4a3a-a477-0f573d3e5000
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Martin Den
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:21:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:21:49Z-
dc.date.issued2000en
dc.identifier.citation6 (8), August 2000en
dc.identifier.issn1077-8012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/15826-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectMeasurementen
dc.titleMethodological issues in the use of survey data for measuring and characterizing violence against womenen
dc.title.alternativeViolence against womenen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2180en
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.description.notesHighlights some of the major methodological and ethical problems associated with the use of surveys for studying violence against women. Difficulty defining and operationalising particular concepts such that they reflect the experiences of all women, under reporting, problems with the reliability and validity of various modes of measuring violence in relationships, interference of bias and the effects of question order, context and content are each identified as issues of concern. Argues that given the gravity of potential emotional and physical harm which can result from neglecting research ethics in this field, there is an urgent need for improvements to be made. Examples of current efforts aimed at such improvements and suggestions for future developments are provided.en
dc.identifier.sourceViolence against womenen
dc.date.entered2001-12-11en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing