Pearls, pith and provocation: developing a safety protocol in qualitative research involving battered women

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16111

Record ID: 54b16df9-a0f4-40db-8ca5-e8c60ad78a4e

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Langford, David R	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:23:43Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:23:43Z	-
dc.date.issued	2000	en
dc.identifier.citation	10 (1), January 2000	en
dc.identifier.issn	10497323	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16111	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.publisher	Sage Publications	en
dc.subject	Risk assessment	en
dc.title	Pearls, pith and provocation: developing a safety protocol in qualitative research involving battered women	en
dc.title.alternative	Qualitative health research	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	2228	en
dc.subject.keyword	International	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.subject.keyword	Journal article/research paper	en
dc.description.notes	Outlines a model for ensuring the safety of battered women participating in qualitative research. The safety protocol proposed raises issues relating to contacting participants, confidentiality, anonymity, protection of data, location of and conduct during interviews and accurately assessing risks posed to participants. The responsibilities of the researcher with regard to reporting disclosed abuse are also explored, particularly in relation to child abuse and mandatory reporting laws. Argues that to be accountable in research with battered women, safety of participants must be prioritised and the research design thoroughly planned.	en
dc.identifier.source	Qualitative health research	en
dc.date.entered	2001-07-31	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing