Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16180
Record ID: f824938f-bffe-44d9-a24d-6cd1908a9fb4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Eric Len
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:24:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:24:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.citation13 (5), November 2013en
dc.identifier.issn1748-8958en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16180-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen
dc.subjectCriminal justice responsesen
dc.subjectPolicingen
dc.titlePolice controlled antecedents which significantly elevate prosecution and conviction rates in domestic violence casesen
dc.title.alternativeCriminology & criminal justice : the international journal of policy and p[cut]en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2517en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesLogistic regression was used to assess five different police actions that an investigating police officer can choose to employ when handling a domestic violence call. Each significantly increases the likelihood the prosecutor will file charges: obtain photographs (60 percent); find and arrest the defendant (94 percent); obtain an emergency protective order (87 percent); locate additional witnesses (68 percent); and list more than one criminal charge in the police report (284 percent). Three optional police actions increase the likelihood of criminal conviction: find and arrest the defendant (78 percent); obtain an emergency protective order (102 percent); list more than one charge (142 percent). Survival analysis shows a sixth action, completing the investigation the same day, to significantly increase rates of criminal case filing and also rates of criminal conviction. A strong case, best practices model for the investigation of domestic violence incidents was validated and is presented. Police discretion is discussed. Lawmakers should consider making these optional investigative actions mandatory.<br/ >[2014 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. For further information, visit http://crj.sagepub.com/]en
dc.identifier.sourceCriminology & criminal justice : the international journal of policy and p[cut]en
dc.date.entered2014-06-16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing