Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: probing inconsistency and questioning conduct

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16182

Record ID: bb4f413d-b664-47f4-8fbe-5a474060a005

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Willott, Sara	en
dc.contributor.author	Antaki, Charles	en
dc.contributor.author	Richardson, Emma	en
dc.contributor.author	Stokoe, Elizabeth	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-30T23:24:12Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-30T23:24:12Z	-
dc.date.issued	2016	en
dc.identifier.citation	Vol. 19, no. 3	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16182	-
dc.language	en	en
dc.subject	Police	en
dc.subject	Intellectual disability	en
dc.subject	Interviews	en
dc.subject	Sexual assault	en
dc.title	Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: probing inconsistency and questioning conduct	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.catalogid	13272	en
dc.subject.keyword	new_record	en
dc.description.notes	Studies 19 UK police interviews with complainants with intellectual disability alleging<br/ > sexual assault and rape. The study found that most interviewing officers on occasion<br/ > pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies but implicitly questioned complainants' conduct. Detaisl two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants' accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with intellectual disability.<br/ >excert from abstract	en
dc.identifier.source	Journal of sociolinguistics	en
dc.date.entered	2016-05-16	en
Appears in Collections:	Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

Who's citing