Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16182
Record ID: bb4f413d-b664-47f4-8fbe-5a474060a005
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Willott, Sara | en |
dc.contributor.author | Antaki, Charles | en |
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, Emma | en |
dc.contributor.author | Stokoe, Elizabeth | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-30T23:24:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-30T23:24:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 19, no. 3 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16182 | - |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.subject | Police | en |
dc.subject | Intellectual disability | en |
dc.subject | Interviews | en |
dc.subject | Sexual assault | en |
dc.title | Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: probing inconsistency and questioning conduct | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.catalogid | 13272 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | new_record | en |
dc.description.notes | Studies 19 UK police interviews with complainants with intellectual disability alleging<br/ > sexual assault and rape. The study found that most interviewing officers on occasion<br/ > pursued lines of questioning which not only probed inconsistencies but implicitly questioned complainants' conduct. Detaisl two main conversational practices which imply disbelief and disapproval of the complainants' accounts and behaviour, and whose pragmatic entailments may pose problems for complainants with intellectual disability.<br/ >excert from abstract | en |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of sociolinguistics | en |
dc.date.entered | 2016-05-16 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.