Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16251
Record ID: 84306fa0-0260-4c9e-ad0e-c2d27fe3497e
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Leslie Ken
dc.contributor.authorKennerly, Robert Jen
dc.contributor.authorDeHart, Dana Den
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T23:24:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T23:24:42Z-
dc.date.issued1999en
dc.identifier.citation14 (1), 1999en
dc.identifier.issn0885-7482en
dc.identifier.urihttps://anrows.intersearch.com.au/anrowsjspui/handle/1/16251-
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Plenum Publishersen
dc.subjectPerpetratorsen
dc.titlePredictors of attrition in a treatment program for battering menen
dc.title.alternativeJournal of family violenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.catalogid2282en
dc.subject.keywordJournal article/research paperen
dc.subject.keywordInternationalen
dc.subject.keywordnew_recorden
dc.description.notesBatterer programmes implemented throughout the United States are group based and often focus on issues of anger management and coping skills, non violent conflict resolution, reducing need for control, and personal accountability for violent behaviour. The authors review some of the already existing studies, which examine reasons for attrition in these batterer programmes, and test some of their assumptions in a study with 61 men enrolled in a batterer programme in a mid-size American city. Their starting assumptions stem from these previous studies, and include demographic variables of race, age, employment, relationship and socioeconomic status as predicting factors to attrition. There are a number of hypotheses in the study, such as that attitudinal and personality variables, and contextual/programme variables might account for attrition more parsimoniously; that attrition would be predicted by frequency and severity of violence, denial of a problem with violence, rigidity of thinking, low levels of self-disclosure, and higher anxiety and constriction in social situations; that it would relate to dependency, maladaptive personality styles; and expectations regarding group counselling, and whether batterer participation in treatment was self-motivated or the result of external pressures. The findings indicated that programme attrition was unrelated to demographic, attitudinal, or personality variables, and it was only the contextual/programme variables of mileage travelled to attend, and external monitoring of attendance, that significantly differentiated treatment rejecters, drop-outs, and treatment continuers. Implications of these findings and locus for future examination are discussed.en
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of family violenceen
dc.date.entered2001-05-17en
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ANROWS library are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing